2: Files served out of B2 don’t have the right content-type headers present.įor example, if I type in the path to an index.html file hosted on B2, it.

1: The url B2 provides isn’t exactly something that would make for a catchy.That stand between us and an awesome static website. That’s a good start, but there are three problems Using B2 to Host a Site?ī2 does allow you to set a bucket to “public”, and then provides a url whereĪnyone can download the files. Take a look at hosting a static website from B2. I’m always rooting for the underdog, so let’s In recent years a new challenger has appeared, aĬompany called Backblaze has begun offering a service called “B2” that is wildlyĬheaper than the competition. Simple Storage Service), Google’s is called “Cloud Storage”, and Microsoft’s Amazon’s bucket service is called “S3” (short for They all provide a way to store files without having The big three cloud providers all have their bucket solutions, which is to say Like the image below, assuming we use Amazon for everything. Maybe sticking Cloudfront in front of it for good measure.

Probably come across the possibility of hosting your site out of Amazon S3 and

If you’ve been around the ol’ static website hosting block a few times, you’ve

Backblaze vs s3